BackAviChina Industry & Technology Ltd. Class H Overview
AviChina Industry & Technology Co. Ltd. Class H

AviChina Industry & Technology Ltd. Class H Return on Equity

AviChina Industry & Technology Ltd. Class H (AVIJF) has a ROE of 7.3%, below the Technology sector average of 47.9%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

ROE

7.30%

Return on Equity

7.30%

Return on Equity measures how efficiently a company uses shareholders' equity to generate profits. A higher ROE indicates better profitability relative to equity.

ROE (Comparison Companies)

Loading

ROE History

Loading

ROE Comparison

Loading

AviChina Industry & Technology Ltd. Class H (AVIJF) FAQ

AviChina Industry & Technology Ltd. Class H posts a ROE of 7.3%. That is below the Technology sector average of 47.9%. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Technology stocks, a ROE near 47.9% is typical. AviChina Industry & Technology Ltd. Class H's 7.3% is lower that level. That is roughly 84.8% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

AviChina Industry & Technology Ltd. Class H's ROE moves when the underlying profit, equity, or asset base changes. Cost cuts, pricing power, buybacks, write-downs, and cyclical swings can all shift the percentage. The latest reading is 7.3%; use YoY and peer views to separate noise from signal.

Context for AVIJF's ROE usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 47.9%), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; AviChina Industry & Technology Ltd. Class H's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging AviChina Industry & Technology Ltd. Class H against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in ROE easier to interpret. Start with 7.3% here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.