BackAselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Class B Overview
Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Class B

Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Class B PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Class B: 38.14 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

38.14

PEG Ratio

38.14

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Class B (ASELS.IS) FAQ

Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Class B posts a PEG ratio of 38.14. That is above the Technology sector average of 2.99. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Technology stocks, a PEG ratio near 2.99 is typical. Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Class B's 38.14 is higher that level. That is roughly 1173.9% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Class B's PEG ratio of 38.14 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for ASELS.IS's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 2.99), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Class B's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Aselsan Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. Class B against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 38.14 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.