BackJapan Tissue Engineering , Ltd. Overview
Japan Tissue Engineering Co., Ltd.

Japan Tissue Engineering , Ltd. PEG Ratio

Japan Tissue Engineering , Ltd. (7774.T) has a PEG ratio of 60.18, above the Healthcare sector average of 11.77.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

60.18

PEG Ratio

60.18

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Japan Tissue Engineering , Ltd. (7774.T) FAQ

Japan Tissue Engineering , Ltd. posts a PEG ratio of 60.18. That is above the Healthcare sector average of 11.77. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Healthcare stocks, a PEG ratio near 11.77 is typical. Japan Tissue Engineering , Ltd.'s 60.18 is higher that level. That is roughly 411.2% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Japan Tissue Engineering , Ltd.'s PEG ratio of 60.18 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for 7774.T's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 11.77), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Japan Tissue Engineering , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Japan Tissue Engineering , Ltd. against Healthcare peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Healthcare are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 60.18 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.