BackLiuzhou Iron & Steel , Ltd. Overview
Liuzhou Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

Liuzhou Iron & Steel , Ltd. PEG Ratio

Latest PEG ratio for Liuzhou Iron & Steel , Ltd.: -45.32 — see history and peer comparisons.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

-45.32

PEG Ratio

-45.32

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Liuzhou Iron & Steel , Ltd. (601003.SS) FAQ

Liuzhou Iron & Steel , Ltd. posts a PEG ratio of -45.32. That is below the Materials sector average of 25.95. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Materials stocks, a PEG ratio near 25.95 is typical. Liuzhou Iron & Steel , Ltd.'s -45.32 is lower that level. That is roughly 274.6% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Liuzhou Iron & Steel , Ltd.'s PEG ratio of -45.32 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for 601003.SS's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 25.95), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Liuzhou Iron & Steel , Ltd.'s other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Liuzhou Iron & Steel , Ltd. against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with -45.32 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.