BackAurelius Technologies Berhad Overview
Aurelius Technologies Berhad

Aurelius Technologies Berhad PEG Ratio

Valuation check: 5302.KL's PEG ratio is -62.99, below the Technology sector average of 2.99.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

-62.99

PEG Ratio

-62.99

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Aurelius Technologies Berhad (5302.KL) FAQ

Aurelius Technologies Berhad posts a PEG ratio of -62.99. That is below the Technology sector average of 2.99. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Technology stocks, a PEG ratio near 2.99 is typical. Aurelius Technologies Berhad's -62.99 is lower that level. That is roughly 2203.9% below the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Aurelius Technologies Berhad's PEG ratio of -62.99 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for 5302.KL's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 2.99), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Aurelius Technologies Berhad's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Aurelius Technologies Berhad against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with -62.99 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.