BackBuild King Holdings Limited Overview
Build King Holdings Limited

Build King Holdings Limited PEG Ratio

Build King Holdings Limited (0240.HK) has a PEG ratio of 73.72, above the Industrials sector average of 16.66.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

PEG Ratio

73.72

PEG Ratio

73.72

The PEG ratio measures a stock's valuation relative to its earnings growth rate. A PEG ratio below 1.0 may indicate that the stock is undervalued relative to its growth potential.

PEG Ratio (Comparison Companies)

Loading

PEG Ratio History

Loading

PEG Ratio Comparison

Loading

Build King Holdings Limited (0240.HK) FAQ

Build King Holdings Limited posts a PEG ratio of 73.72. That is above the Industrials sector average of 16.66. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

For Industrials stocks, a PEG ratio near 16.66 is typical. Build King Holdings Limited's 73.72 is higher that level. That is roughly 342.5% above the sector mean. Whether that is a warning or an opportunity depends on growth outlook and other fundamentals shown elsewhere on Stockcircle.

Build King Holdings Limited's PEG ratio of 73.72 comes from dividing a price-based measure by a related financial statistic. Changes can come from the stock price moving, the underlying fundamental shifting, or both. Track both the level and the trend — a rising multiple on falling fundamentals is a different story than a rising multiple on rising earnings.

Context for 0240.HK's PEG ratio usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers (average 16.66), and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Build King Holdings Limited's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Build King Holdings Limited against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in PEG ratio easier to interpret. Start with 73.72 here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.