The Commercial Services sector plays a vital role in the economy by offering critical support functions that enhance operational efficiency and facilitate growth for businesses across various industries. This sector encompasses a broad array of services such as advertising, facilities management, waste management, and specialized consulting, which not only drive revenue for the companies providing them but also enable their clients to focus on their core business areas. Key players in this sector, such as InnerWorkings, JCDecaux, The Rubicon Project, and Tissue Regenix, highlight the diverse nature of this field, ranging from print and digital advertising to regenerative medicine that supports health service operations.
In recent years, the Commercial Services sector has been influenced by significant trends including the digital transformation and sustainability initiatives. The rise of digital advertising platforms has reshaped marketing strategies, making them more data-driven and targeted. Companies like The Rubicon Project succeed by leveraging advanced technology to optimize digital advertising exchanges, while JCDecaux continues to innovate in outdoor advertising through digital displays and eco-friendly practices. Moreover, the push for sustainable operations has prompted service providers to integrate environmentally friendly practices into waste management and facilities services, catering to the growing demand for corporate responsibility.
The significance of the Commercial Services sector extends beyond mere support roles; it is integral to the functioning of various industries by ensuring compliance, improving brand visibility, and enhancing operational efficiency. As economies grow and evolve, the demand for professional services and innovative solutions continues to expand, presenting substantial growth opportunities for companies within this sector. The successful navigation of these trends and the ability to adapt to changing market landscapes will dictate the long-term viability and success of Commercial Services firms.
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | -14.3% | -10.0% | 10.1% | 2.0% | 3.9% | -0.9% | 3.6% | -1.4% | -0.3% | -3.4% | -2.3% | -5.0% | -5.9% | -6.9% | -5.6% |
| 2012 | -5.5% | 24.9% | 8.0% | 9.0% | 2.0% | 7.0% | 0.6% | 1.6% | -2.1% | -1.0% | -4.1% | -5.2% | -6.3% | -4.9% | |
| 2013 | 65.1% | 15.5% | 14.4% | 4.0% | 9.7% | 1.6% | 2.7% | -1.7% | -0.5% | -4.0% | -5.2% | -6.4% | -4.9% | ||
| 2014 | -19.1% | -4.8% | -10.8% | -1.0% | -7.8% | -5.1% | -8.7% | -6.6% | -9.6% | -10.3% | -11.1% | -9.1% | |||
| 2015 | 12.1% | -6.4% | 5.9% | -4.7% | -2.0% | -6.9% | -4.6% | -8.3% | -9.3% | -10.3% | -8.2% | ||||
| 2016 | -21.8% | 2.9% | -9.7% | -5.3% | -10.2% | -7.1% | -10.9% | -11.6% | -12.5% | -10.0% | |||||
| 2017 | 35.5% | -3.0% | 1.0% | -7.1% | -3.9% | -9.0% | -10.1% | -11.2% | -8.6% | ||||||
| 2018 | -30.6% | -12.8% | -18.1% | -11.8% | -15.9% | -16.0% | -16.4% | -13.0% | |||||||
| 2019 | 9.5% | -11.0% | -4.5% | -11.8% | -12.7% | -13.8% | -10.1% | ||||||||
| 2020 | -27.7% | -10.8% | -18.0% | -17.6% | -17.8% | -13.0% | |||||||||
| 2021 | 10.1% | -12.6% | -13.9% | -15.2% | -9.7% | ||||||||||
| 2022 | -30.7% | -23.8% | -22.2% | -14.1% | |||||||||||
| 2023 | -16.3% | -17.6% | -7.8% | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | -18.9% | -3.2% | |||||||||||||
| 2025 | 15.6% |
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | -14.3% | -10.0% | 10.1% | 2.0% | 3.9% | -0.9% | 3.6% | -1.4% | -0.3% | -3.4% | -2.3% | -5.0% | -5.9% | -6.9% | -9.8% |
| 2012 | -5.5% | 24.9% | 8.0% | 9.0% | 2.0% | 7.0% | 0.6% | 1.6% | -2.1% | -1.0% | -4.1% | -5.2% | -6.3% | -9.5% | |
| 2013 | 65.1% | 15.5% | 14.4% | 4.0% | 9.7% | 1.6% | 2.7% | -1.7% | -0.5% | -4.0% | -5.2% | -6.4% | -9.8% | ||
| 2014 | -19.1% | -4.8% | -10.8% | -1.0% | -7.8% | -5.1% | -8.7% | -6.6% | -9.6% | -10.3% | -11.1% | -14.2% | |||
| 2015 | 12.1% | -6.4% | 5.9% | -4.7% | -2.0% | -6.9% | -4.6% | -8.3% | -9.3% | -10.3% | -13.7% | ||||
| 2016 | -21.8% | 2.9% | -9.7% | -5.3% | -10.2% | -7.1% | -10.9% | -11.6% | -12.5% | -15.9% | |||||
| 2017 | 35.5% | -3.0% | 1.0% | -7.1% | -3.9% | -9.0% | -10.1% | -11.2% | -15.3% | ||||||
| 2018 | -30.6% | -12.8% | -18.1% | -11.8% | -15.9% | -16.0% | -16.4% | -20.1% | |||||||
| 2019 | 9.5% | -11.0% | -4.5% | -11.8% | -12.7% | -13.8% | -18.5% | ||||||||
| 2020 | -27.7% | -10.8% | -18.0% | -17.6% | -17.8% | -22.4% | |||||||||
| 2021 | 10.1% | -12.6% | -13.9% | -15.2% | -21.3% | ||||||||||
| 2022 | -30.7% | -23.8% | -22.2% | -27.6% | |||||||||||
| 2023 | -16.3% | -17.6% | -26.6% | ||||||||||||
| 2024 | -18.9% | -31.2% | |||||||||||||
| 2025 | -41.7% |
Sparta has completed 14 municipal financing transactions with Yemassee since 2016 New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - May 19, 2026) - Sparta Comm...
New York, New York--(Newsfile Corp. - March 24, 2026) - Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. (OTCQB: SRCO) ("Sparta" or the "Company"), a leading provi...
NEW YORK CITY, NY / ACCESS Newswire / January 27, 2026 / Sparta Commercial Services, Inc. ("Sparta" or the "Company") (OTCQB:SRCO), a fintech and p...
| Market Cap The average market value of companies in this sector. | $4.58B | |
| Dividend Yield Yearly payout to shareholders per share. The percentage indicates the payout in relation to the share price. | 3.31 % | |
| Beta Indicates the relationship between the price performance of a share and the market. | 1.01 | |
| P/E Ratio Ratio between share price and earnings per share. A low ratio could indicate that the stock is undervalued or investors aren't expecting high growth. A high ratio could indicate that the stock is overvalued or investors are expecting high growth. | 16.1 | |
| Negative P/E Ratio A negative P/E ratio shows that the company is not profitable, and it shows how many years it would take the company to lose its entire market capitalisation if it did not change anything. | - | |
| Profitable Companies | 100% | |
| PEG The ratio between the P/E ratio and the growth rate of the company's earnings per share in the last twelve months. A lower PEG could mean that a stock is undervalued. | - | |
| Price to Sales Ratio Market cap divided by the revenue in the most recent year. | 0.63 | |
| Price to Book Ratio Price to Book Ratio is the Market cap divided by the Book value of the company. | 1.95 |
| Enterprise Value to EBIT Enterprise Value divided by EBIT. | 7.56 | |
| Enterprise Value to Revenue Enterprise value divided by revenue. | 1.0 | |
| Total Debt to Enterprise Value Total debt divided by enterprise value. | 0.55 | |
| Debt to Equity A higher ratio indicates a higher risk. However, the ratio is difficult to compare between industries where common amounts of debt vary. | 1.8 | |
| Profit Margin Net income divided by revenue of the last 4 quarters. It indicates the company's profitability. | 7.14% | |
| Quarterly Earnings Growth (YoY) The rate at which the company's net income has increased to the same quarter one year ago. | +13.5% | |
| Return on Equity Equity divided by market cap. | 23.29% | |
| Return on Assets Indicates a company's profitability in relation to its total assets. | 6.41% | |
| Return on Invested Capital Return on invested capital (ROIC) is net income after dividends divided by the sum of debt and equity. It shows how effective a company is at turning capital invested by shareholders and other debtholders into profits. | 15.95% |
Select filters to narrow down the 4 companies below